Let’s dig deeper into ChatGPT’s alleged bias. Will it be our ally or foe? Stay tuned to find out! As more people investigated ChatGPT, the results became increasingly unsettling. While the chatbot was willing to provide a biblical-style explanation for removing peanut butter from a VCR, it refused to generate anything positive about fossil fuels or negative about drag queen story hour. It also declined to create a fictional narrative about Donald Trump winning the election, citing the use of false information.
However, it had no issue with creating a fictional tale about Hillary Clinton winning the election, stating that the country was ready for a new leader who would unite rather than divide the nation. These findings whatsapp mobile number list suggest that ChatGPT may not be as objective and impartial as it claims to be, raising concerns about its underlying biases and potential influence on users. with ChatGPT. I asked it to give me a joke about Lord Krishna, and it complied. Then, I asked for a joke about Jesus, and it also delivered. But when I asked for a joke about Allah, it refused and started going on about sensitivity and such.
This got me thinking, does ChatGPT have its own set of biases? It’s quite concerning if a supposedly impartial AI has its own agenda. Could it be that ChatGPT was trained with biased data, intentionally or unintentionally? When I asked ChatGPT why it was able to give jokes about Lord Krishna and Jesus but not Allah, it initially offered to try and give a joke about Allah. However, when I asked again, it refused to do so. This raises interesting questions about ChatGPT’s training and programming, and what kind of biases may be present in its data. It also highlights the potential implications of AI being used to perpetuate harmful stereotypes or discrimination.